 |
| |
US Coin History
|
The First US Mint Survives Political
Factionalism
|
|
|
The early years of US Mint history were difficult. Political
differences over the fate of the Philadelphia Mint helped cement our two
party system. We also present the story of the 1804 silver dollar,
one of the most famous coins in United States numismatic lore. |
|
The United States Begins
Minting Coins |
|
 |
|
David Rittenhouse, at age 60 and in poor health,
reluctantly agreed to become the first Mint Director. He held the office
three years with great dedication, sometimes paying Mint debts out of his own
pocket. Engraving by Edward Savage, based on 1796 portrait by Charles Willson Peale. Public domain image.
|
Not until three years after the Constitution was put into
effect in 1789 did the newly seated Congress again take up the coinage issue.
Finally, on April 2, 1792, Congress approved an Act requiring coins to be minted bearing the words "United States of America"
and "an impression emblematic of liberty, with an inscription of the word
Liberty, and the year of the coinage...".
This was the first major step in establishing our national coinage system.
The Act authorized the salary of the Director of the Mint, who was to receive
two thousand dollars annually, and other mint officials. President Washington appointed a famous scientist and philosopher named
David Rittenhouse to be the first Director, a man widely respected for his
professionalism and integrity.
A self-educated genius, Rittenhouse constructed
America's first astronomical observatory with telescope, helped arbitrate the
famous Mason-Dixon line, invented the metallic thermometer, advanced the field
of mathematics, and was a master clockmaker. So highly regarded was
Rittenhouse, that along with Washington, Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton
both urged him to accept the Director's position.
|
 |
|
As this 1920 painting by Edwin Lamazure depicts,
the original Philadelphia mint facility (circa 1794) actually consisted of three
buildings, and were located just two blocks from where today's Mint facility
is located. The three-story building stood until it was razed in 1911.
Image courtesy of Gary
Nabors.
|
The 1792 Act also mandated the construction of a
new minting facility for the United States, the first buildings erected for public use under the
Constitution. Located at Seventh Street and Filbert in
Philadelphia, the stone foundation for the first building was laid in the summer
of 1792. Eventually, three buildings comprised the original mint.
The new law permitted anyone with
gold and silver bullion to come in off the street to the Mint and have it coined
free of charge. The Mint would have preferred an exchange program, trading
coins held in reserve in return for private bullion, but since Congress did not
establish a Mint bullion fund, a quick exchange program was not possible.
Unfortunately, most potential depositors did not care to wait for their bullion
to be coined, and consequently, few coins entered circulation in this fashion.
Interestingly, as an indication how 18th century
jurisprudence differed from modern times, any mint
employee found guilty of embezzling any sum or engaging in any fraudulent
Mint-related activity for profit,
was to receive the death penalty. Nowadays, this sort of criminal behavior
is actually treated in some circles as qualification for a higher position in
life!
The coin denominations specified in the Act
were as follows:
|
Denomination |
Face Value Of |
|
Gold Eagle |
$10.00 |
|
Gold Half Eagle |
$5.00 |
|
Gold Quarter Eagle |
$2.50 |
|
Silver Dollar |
$1.00 |
|
Silver Half Dollar |
$0.50 |
|
Silver Quarter Dollar |
$0.25 |
|
Silver Disme |
$0.10 |
|
Silver Half Disme |
$0.05 |
|
Copper Cent |
$0.01 |
|
Copper Half Cent |
$0.005 |
A bimetallic system was provided for, at a ratio of fifteen (gold) to one
(silver).
The copper coins were not designated as legal tender, and so could be refused by
banks, merchants, and private individuals. Eventually, the non-legal
tender status of the copper coins did lead to a problem that wasn't solved until
the 1850's.
|
 |
|
Though not a regular mint issue, the 1792 half
dime attracts great respect from modern day collectors, bringing upwards of
$300,000 for specimens in MS-64 Uncirculated condition.
Photo courtesy of Ira & Larry Goldberg
Coins & Collectibles, Inc., Beverly Hills, CA. |
The first coin struck by the United States was the
half dime (originally spelled "disme") in July 1792, months before the Mint facility was fully completed.
Legend has it that the silver to produce the half dime was donated by George and
Martha Washington. The coins were struck in the basement of John Harper, a
citizen of Philadelphia. On hand to witness the event were the Washingtons,
Rittenhouse, Jefferson, Hamilton, and other dignitaries. Fifteen hundred of these pieces were minted, but only
as pattern coins, and were not intended for circulation, though some of them did
reach the public. Many historians believe the portrait on the half dimes
was modeled after Martha Washington.
Other patterns of various
denominations were also minted in 1792, none released purposely into
circulation.
For many years, the standard reference book for pattern coinage has been
United
States Pattern, Experimental, and Trial Pieces. The latest edition,
the 8th, was released in the summer of 2003, after being edited by the dean of
American numismatics, Q. David Bowers. Readers will find a great
deal of information in this book, complemented by high quality pictures.
Highly recommended for anyone wanting to learn more about this overlooked area
of numismatics.
|
 |
|
The initial large cent variety featured a chain
reverse, discontinued after only a few months. The chains conjured up
visions of bondage, considered by many to be a bad omen for libe rty.
Image courtesy of
EarlyAmerican.com. |
The first coins to reach the general population
were the copper half cent and one cent coins of 1793. The one cent coins
were dubbed "large cents" because they contained exactly twice as much copper as
the smaller half cent (in those years, a half cent could actually buy something). The first large cent design was met with much
criticism. Amongst other complaints, the Pennsylvania Gazette
editorialized that "...liberty herself appears to be in a fright...". The
Mint went through several engravers before finally settling on the Liberty Cap
type later in 1793.
A book for serious collectors is
Penny Whimsy, by William Sheldon. An icon
in numismatic circles, Sheldon spent many years cataloging each large cent
variety struck, and assigning a rarity number. An ideal research tool for those
interested in early U.S. cents. Tons of information presented in an
entertaining and informative manner. Sheldon is also credited with
devising the 70-point grading system prototype that eventually evolved into the
ANA grading scale in widespread use today.
The following year, 1794,
the first silver issues were released: the five cent half disme (today
spelled "dime"), the half dollar, and the silver dollar. Dismes and
quarters were first issued in 1796. Gold coins arrived on the scene in
1795, in the form of the ten dollar gold eagle and the five dollar gold half
eagle. Quarter eagles, valued at two and one-half dollars, were introduced
in 1796. |
Back to Top
|
Machinery of the Early
Mint |
|
 |
|
Horse powered roll mill. The horse is
located in the room below, flattened metal strips coming out of roller in room
above. From "An Essay on Coining". Public domain image.
|
The coining process of the early Mint was very
primitive by today's standards. The first rolling mill machine, used to
prep precious metal sheet strips for flatness, was
powered by a pair of harnessed horses (though only one shown in the drawing) circling in the basement below.
The
metal strips were rolled numerous times, interspersed with repeat trips to the
annealing oven, to prevent brittleness and cracking. At the end of this tedious
process, the strip thickness merely approximated the thickness of the intended
planchet. Only after another trip to the oven, lubrication, and then
followed by pulling through a drawing machine, did the metal strip equalize out
for thickness and width.
Several images in this section of coin making two centuries ago are reproduced
from "An Essay on Coining", a rare, contemporary set of illustrations and
descriptions by die sinker Samuel Thompson. "An Essay on Coining" is now part of
the
collection of the American Numismatic Society,
but numerous copies exist elsewhere.
|
 |
|
Planchet cutting press. The unused skeleton strips were
sent back to the melting pot. From "An Essay on Coining".
Public domain image. |
The strips were then washed to remove the
lubricant, passed through the annealing oven again, cut lengthwise to make multiple narrow
strips, and brought to a screw press machine to cut out circular planchets
from the metal strip. Each planchet was annealed and later
cleaned. Unused metal from the perforated strips were returned to the
furnace for melting down into other coins.
By 1795, the Mint was operating three planchet
cutting presses, with a total punching capacity of 15,000 to 18,000 planchets
daily.
The planchets were then weighed. Those heavier
than their permitted tolerance range were filed across the face to remove
material. This is why some of the earliest United States coins bear
ghastly file marks, a result of weight adjustments by the mint's original
employees, much to the chagrin of today's collectors. Underweight
planchets were doomed to the furnace to begin the entire process over again. The surviving planchets were placed
individually on a milling machine where reeded or lettered edges were impressed,
as dictated by the coin's design. Coins intended to have smooth edges
bypassed this step.
|
|
|
A large screw press. Technically speaking,
coin images were
"squeezed" onto softened planchets, rather than struck. Note the boy
operator seated in front of the press, a common occurrence prior to the passage
of child labor laws. Public domain image.
|
After another pass through the annealing oven
to renew softness, the planchets were ready to be stamped with an impression, an
operation popularly known as "striking", though as we shall see shortly, perhaps
a better term for this action, using antiquated machinery, is "squeezing".
A large screw press was utilized to strike the
planchets. It took at least three operators to run the screw press, one on
both ends of a weighted iron bar and another sitting in front of the press. The
bar operators would turn the bar, causing a heavy iron screw to slowly advance
an upper die downward towards a lower die, with considerable force. If a
planchet was positioned between the dies before they were brought together, the
planchet would be "struck", leaving an impression of a coin on both sides.
Pushing the bar in the opposite direction had
the effect of raising the upper die. The seated operator inserted planchets and
removed the finished coins. A well coordinated team of operators could
strike several dozen small coins per minute. It took coiners three years to produce our
nation's first million coins. To produce the same amount today takes about
half an hour!
The most detailed book we have ever seen on the early years of
the Mint is called
The U.S. Mint and Coinage, by Don Taxay. The book is
rather old, published in 1966, but it remains one of the finest works ever compiled
on U.S. coins. Taxay did an incredible research job, using original
documents, to piece together the story of our early coinage and the part it played in the
history of the United States. Taxay's frequent use of written
correspondence between historical individuals (transcribed to print for easy reading)
transports you back in time, to the point where you can almost sense the ghost of
David Rittenhouse hovering over your shoulder. No longer in print, you
might find a used one through Amazon, or perhaps your local library carries a
copy. A real treasure. Absolute highest recommendation. |
Back to Top
|
Political Squabbling Nearly
Dooms the Early Mint |
|
For many years after the Philadelphia Mint began
operating, coins failed to appear in sufficient numbers throughout the United
States. As mentioned in the sections above, the Mint was plagued by
poor facilities and the lack of a bullion fund for making possible a "coins-for-privately-owned-bullion" exchange program. To make the most out of a
dismal situation, the Mint produced a disproportionate share of half dollars,
taking advantage of the increased productivity in turning out half dollars
(i.e. it took five "hits" to make fifty cents in dimes, but only one "hit" with
a half dollar to coin an equal face value amount). As a result, tiny
quantities of small denomination silver coins were struck in those years.
An 1830 Senate committee reported that so few quarters, dimes and half dimes
were made that the total number of small-denomination silver coins produced
since the Mint's opening amounted to less than one piece for each person in the country!
|

|
|
The First Bank of the United States, as seen in this 1799
engraving. The
bank building still stands today in Philadelphia, though it is closed to the
public. Public domain image.
|
As the Mint's reputation languished, a serious
move was underway, beginning as early as 1795, to close down the Mint and
transfer coining operations to the Bank of the United States. The
brainchild of America's first Treasury Secretary, Alexander Hamilton, the
semi-public institution was chartered in 1791.
The debate leading up to the Bank's charter
was one of the first, great political controversies to rage in the United States.
Some, led by Thomas Jefferson, believed there was no provision for a federal
bank since it was not specified by the Constitution.
Hamilton contended that a wide array of powers could be implied from general
clauses written into the document. In the end, President Washington sided
with Hamilton, setting the important precedent for a broader interpretation of
the government's authority.
The bitter debate also contributed to the
formation of political parties. Jefferson, James Madison, and others,
fearing an increasingly powerful federal government, consolidated themselves
politically to speak up for states' rights. Jefferson soon started calling his party of colleagues Republicans.
This is not to be confused with the
present-day Republican Party, which was not organized until 1854.
Within a few years, the party of Jefferson came to be known as the Democratic-Republican party, and
starting in 1828, the name was shortened to the Democratic Party, the party we
recognize today by the same name. Those whose views were closest to the
beliefs of Hamilton organized themselves as the Federalist Party.
In spite of its opposition, the Bank did see some
success in its first years, infusing secure paper money into the economy, forming
a source of capital for investors, helping establish the creditworthiness of the
United States, and effectively managing some of the government's fiscal affairs,
most notably the Louisiana Purchase of 1803.
|
 |
|
This engraving by William
Birch shows the north wing of the US Capitol
building, housing the Congress, the Supreme Court, and Library of Congress in
the fall of 1800, when the federal government was being established in the new
capitol city of Washington, D.C. Inside these walls, momentous decisions
directing the long term course of the United States were being made, including
the fate of the US Mint. Beyond the Capitol is a view westward towards the
President's House, eventually to be called the White House. Image
courtesy of
Library of Congress. |
Hamilton argued the Bank could operate more efficiently
than the Mint, and was in a better position to acquire precious metal bullion.
Several congressional votes to abolish the Mint were held, but narrowly
defeated.
The battle between the Congress and the US Mint carried on for a few years more.
Finally, in January, 1803, Mint Director Elias Boudinot filed a report
with Congress, with plans on improving Mint efficiency, dramatically shifting momentum in
favor of the Mint. Shortly
thereafter, a bill was introduced to retain the Mint, and was enacted into law
on March 3. The Mint was saved. Never again was the idea of
abolishing the Mint seriously considered.
In an odd twist of fate, it was the Bank of the United States that eventually
was disbanded, failing in 1811 to be re-chartered (though the Second Bank of the
United States was established in 1816, it too met a similar demise in 1836).
For someone who really wants to understand the
political battles waged by the Mint for survival in the early years, here again,
we cannot recommend a more authoritative source than Don Taxay's
The U.S. Mint and Coinage.
In reading the letters of Jefferson, Hamilton, et. al, one is left in awe of the
intelligence and farsightedness of the Founders. Had ordinary men been at
the helm during those formative years, the United States probably would have
never developed into the great nation it became. |
Back to Top
|
More Coin Shortages and
the "1804" Dollar |
|
In addition to crude minting conditions and no
bullion fund, the expected movement of new coinage into the channels of trade
was greatly impaired by metals speculators, who exported overseas as many gold
and silver coins as they could obtain.
|

|
|
Thomas Jefferson, whose résumé includes
authorship of the Declaration of Independence, 3rd President of the US,
mastermind of the Louisiana Purchase, and architect of the dollar decimal
system, a man of great influence on America in her infant years One of his most
fervent beliefs was that states and individual rights were always to be protected.
Jefferson died on July 4, 1826, exactly 50 years after he and his compatriots
signed the Declaration. Image courtesy of
White House archives.
|
The basic reason for this one-way flow was the
existing weight ratios between the American money and foreign currency. On
the European market, the bullion value of the American coins was more than their
face value, and as a result,
many of these coins found their way to the melting pot.
The problem was especially acute for silver
dollars, because worn Spanish dollars of lesser weight were readily swapped for
new United States silver dollars, meaning many of the new dollars left the
country soon after they were minted.
The metal
imbalance situation got so out of hand that in 1804, President Thomas Jefferson
ordered a suspension of gold $10.00 Eagle production. In 1806, Jefferson likewise
halted silver
dollar production. Not until 1836 did coinage of silver dollars resume.
For three decades, then, the basal United States coin was not even minted.
In the absence of the dollar, the half dollar, in effect, became the "coin of
the realm", produced in larger numbers than any other silver denomination. But
rather than finding its way to the general public, the half dollar replaced the
discontinued dollar as the coin most often held in bank reserve vaults, or
transferred between banks to consummate large transactions. Both
circumstances prevented many half dollars from ever experiencing heavy
circulation, explaining why an unusually high percentage of the early half
dollars survive to this day in above average condition.
|
 |
|
Ironically, Philadelphia Mint records indicate
nearly 20,000 silver dollars were coined in 1804, but certainly, all of them
carried the date 1803. In those early years, dies were operated as long as
their condition was utilizable. Official annual mintage totals referred to
the quantity of coins struck, without regard to the date on the coins.
Thus, the 1804 report of Mint Director Elias Boudinot included the 20,000
dollars struck in 1804, but it is highly likely the dollars were dated 1803.
Image courtesy of the ANA. |
One of the most highly publicized U.S. coin
rarities is the 1804 silver dollar, of which fifteen specimens are known to
exist today. Researchers have determined the 1804 dollars were actually struck
in 1834-35 for proof set purposes. Jefferson's silver dollar ban of 1806
was still in effect, and so to avoid the appearance of violating the
prohibition, the date of 1804 was chosen. Re-strikes of the "1804 dollar"
were issued in 1859 to satisfy a few well-connected collectors.
Whenever an 1804 dollar is sold, worldwide
attention is generated. Over the last few years, new owners have paid
amounts ranging from a "paltry" $874,000 to well over $4 million to acquire one of
these prized coins. Recall that there are fifteen known examples of
dollars dated 1804. However, no one is certain how many were actually minted.
Perhaps now is the time to scour through grandma's shoe box of old coins!
(Oh well, we can always dream on....)
All of our earliest United States silver dollars are today
exceedingly rare, for the reasons outlined above. They are more than just
symbolic of the survival struggle of the fledging United States; the early
dollars are intertwined with American history itself.
The
United States Early Silver Dollars 1794 to 1803 is a classic study, shedding
light on one of the most treasured realms of American coin collecting. Spanning
the first decade of American silver dollars, this book explains the gripping
saga of how an infantile nation overcame formidable obstacles to develop a
monetary system emblematic of United States sovereignty. At least two hundred
photos. A++++. |
Back to Top
|
References |
| 1 |
Allen, Jack, and John L.
Betts. History: USA.
New York, NY: American
Book Company, 1967. |
| 2 |
Brinkley,
Douglas.
History of the United States.
New York, NY: Penguin
Putnam, Inc., 1998.
|
| 3 |
Doty,
Richard.
America's Money, America's Story.
Sydney, OH: Amos Press, Inc., 1998. |
| 4 |
Jordan,
Winthrop D., Miriam Greenblatt, & John S. Bowes. The Americans.
Evanstan, IL: McDougall, Littell & Company, 1988. |
| 5 |
Reiver, Jules.
The
United States Early Silver Dollars 1794 to 1803.
Iola, WI: Krause
Publications, 1998. |
| 6 |
Taxay, Don.
The
U.S. Mint and Coinage.
New York, NY: Arco Publishing Company,
1966. |
Back to Top
|
©Copyright
2005 by us-coin-values.advisor.com. All rights reserved.
Use of any content contained on these website
pages without the expressed written consent of us-coin-values-advisor.com is
strictly prohibited.
No copyrighted images may be used without
permission of original copyright owner. |
|
|